Comments

rraud wrote on 7/18/2024, 10:43 AM

I am not familiar with Ozone 11. If the EQ is a separate plug-in, you can assign it to the FX Plug-ins (favorites) menu though 'View> Plug-in Manager'. As I recall, Ozone 'Elements' 10/11 has an integrated UI with no traditional graphic, paragraphic or parametric EQ.

btw, welcome to the Magix Sound Forge users community @roger-martinez.

xman_charl wrote on 7/18/2024, 10:50 AM

been using ozone 11 for several months...works okay SF 18

 

 

 

my 2 cents

 

Former user wrote on 7/18/2024, 9:08 PM

I've been using Ozone 11 in SFPro18.0 for about 2 weeks now and it's working fine except It doesn't open the previous preset used, may it be custom or built-in. This issue was the other way around in v16.0. I'm still waiting for customer support reply about this. Ozone 11 doesn't work in SFPro 16.1.4. It display as ARA but then when you use it, it doesn't do anything. It works in SFPro 15.0 though. I haven't use SFPro 17.0 because I didn't like the metering (Devs removed the Peak Meter V2) and some plug-in issue from v16.0 were never fix.

Former user wrote on 7/20/2024, 9:40 AM

Correction: Ozone 11 works in SF 16.0 (Img1. Ozone11). It's Ozone RX 11 Advanced that doesn't work in v16.0. I realized my mistake when I checked my ticket to customer support. Ozone RX 11 display as ARA, 64 Bit instead of VST3, 64 Bit (Img2. Ozone RX11) and doesn't do anything when use. Additionally, although "RX 11 Spectral Editor" display as VST3, 64 Bit when use the result is "Spectral Editor ARA is not available for this host" (Img3. RX11 in SF v18.0). This is also true with SF v15 & v16. In Summary RX 11 does not work in SF v16 but works in SF v15 & v18. Ozone 11 works in v15, v16 & 18.

john_barr wrote on 7/30/2024, 7:05 AM

Magix fixes Sound Forge issues very slowly. Because Magix's priority is Vegas. They just released Vegas 22.

Former user wrote on 7/31/2024, 8:59 AM

@john_barr

It's a pity why they do that. I really like SF since it was owned by Sonic Foundry then by Sony because of its simplicity and ease of use. I think until version v16.0 that everything went downhill. Their devs fixed things that weren't broke. Ex. Batch Converter in v.15.0, removed Peak Meter (V2) in v17.0. Is it something they do just because or to make management happy that they are doing something?

john_barr wrote on 7/31/2024, 12:54 PM

@Former user

Good question. Complaining here on the forum won't solve it.