Audio capture from microphone port versus audio/video caputre device

karimsisi wrote on 7/4/2015, 12:06 PM

 

Hello,

In case the photo is not clear (I am an appalling photographer) these two devices are audio/video capture devices with RCA (aka phono) connections on one end, and a USB connection on the other end. I have these two devices and they were very, very cheap I doubt they will make any difference.

 

My question to those with experience, which type of connection is better to use on the PC's side, an analogue to digitial converter like the above two (although I expect them to do a very poor job because they were very cheap), or a 3.5 mm (aka mini jack) in the microphone port on my laptop when digitizing audio from my old cassette tapes? I am currenlty using the stereo RCA line-out ports at the back of my cassette player.

 

NB. I am using the microphone port and not the line in because my laptop lacks a line in port.

Comments

johnebaker wrote on 7/4/2015, 5:30 PM

Hi

The USB device should be better than the microphone input of the laptop.

The RCA out of the cassette player have a much higher signal level than the microphone input can handle, this will  overload the microphone input giving distortion.

HTH

John EB

Last changed by johnebaker on 7/4/2015, 5:30 PM, changed a total of 1 times.

VPX 16, Movie Studio 2025, and earlier versions 2015 and 2016, Music Maker Premium 2024.

PC - running Windows 11 23H2 Professional on Intel i7-8700K 3.2 GHz, 16GB RAM, RTX 2060 6GB 192-bit GDDR6, 1 x 1Tb Sabrent NVME SSD (OS and programs), 2 x 4TB (Data) internal HDD + 1TB internal SSD (Work disc), + 6 ext backup HDDs.

Laptop - Lenovo Legion 5i Phantom - running Windows 11 23H2 on Intel Core i7-10750H, 16GB DDR4-SDRAM, 512GB SSD, 43.9 cm screen Full HD 1920 x 1080, Intel UHD 630 iGPU and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (6GB GDDR6)

Sony FDR-AX53e Video camera, DJI Osmo Action 3 and Sony HDR-AS30V Sports cams.